I think it is and it isn't as it's suitably violent but without blood which in some instances appears to have been intended.

He could hardly get more cartoonish, and during his growly monologues I wondered if this movie was actually intended for children. Like I said, promising themes at first, but Ben Mendelsohn as the Sheriff of Nottingham is not a person you'll come to understand. Where the film immediately goes wrong is establishing a context to the conflict he is drafted into fighting, which clearly includes rampant racism, imperialism, and intolerance of ideology. Robin, of course, is a man of great character, even before his transformation into a thief proper. It could have opened with the first major action sequence, which may be the best part of the film, as it is a far cry from where the action goes from there. For a movie to tease some promising themes at the start (if you ignore the awful opening bit of narrative catch-up that mismatches the film's tone with twee voice over and the weakest relationship setup imaginable) only to glance over them for flat characters is a little mean, because it makes you think it might not be half bad for at least a half an hour. Steal from the rich, give to the poor it's not complicated, and open to a million different interpretations of that core loop, yet here we are. Robin Hood gets his umpteenth retelling yet the film insists it's telling a new version of the story while also basically covering all you already know about the man himself. Reminds me of last year's re-imagining of King Arthur except a heist film this is not.

Robin hood vulpea dublat in romana